Sunday, July 20, 2025

In Brief - How I bootstrapped my startup knowledge

I first started working in startups in 2014 after finally calling it quits on the law path I was on. 

This is a brief rundown on how I built up my startup knowledge:

  • I worked 10+ hour days and 6-7 days a week for a solid 2-3 years
  • I spent my "free" time inhaling information that I could immediately apply to work
    • Startup / business podcasts on the subway
    • Reading books at my desk before starting actual work
    • Reading First Round Review, and other high-quality/tactical websites 
  • I intentionally took on everything and anything at work that could expose me to new areas of the business

A very important part about that ^ grind is that I had no idea what I was doing. 

I had to make up for my ignorance with brute force. 

The worst use of my time for learning was attending in-person events. 

They self-selected for people like me, the information was too broad, the opportunity cost was massive, and so on.

"Founder Mode" lol

The entire IndieVC interview with Eric Ries is worth a watch.

This bit about "Founder Mode" is especially great:

Bryce: Eric, are you telling people to go into Founder Mode?

Eric: What I love about the Founder Mode story, everyone of those guys who made that - who have told those stories - is they're always like "I had to cut through all the bureaucracy, and the red tape, and the this and the dumb people."

And I'm like, "who hired those people? Who set up those systems that you're having to cut through? 

Watch the clip here

Friday, June 6, 2025

It's hard to strike gold twice

Not because founders get worse, but because building a novel business that truly works is very hard.

  • Naval Ravikant - Airchat
  • David Sacks - Glue AI
  • Adam Neuman - Flowcarbon 
  • Marissa mayer - Sunshine 
  • Ev Williams - Mozi
  • Kevin Rose and Alexis Ohanian - Digg relaunch
  • Kevin Systrom - Artifact 
Not a dunk.

Just an observation, a pattern worth noticing, and a reminder that yea, it's hard even if you've succeeded in the past.

Friday, March 21, 2025

On Perplexity - Timeline and Hypotheses [Updated]


I continue to update the timeline as news comes out. The last update was made as of August 5, 2025. I'm not editing other writing.

Check out my tracker spreadsheet here: Perplexity Table

~~~

Perplexity baffles me! 

It’s a fast-growing startup that has built a great product and is stirring competitive reactions from the likes of Google and OpenAI.

At the same time, it's sustainable competitive advantage is unclear, and it's saddled with growth expectations attached to a $3B valuation (maybe $9B). 

To help wrap my had around Perplexity, I created a running 2 year timeline to understand where they've been and help me think through where they might be going.

Read on for a fully sourced timeline of Perplexity's rise, covering:

  • Fundraising
  • Product Launches
  • MAUs
  • Revenue 
  • Legal action
  • and more

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Cheap, Non-Technical and "Building": How to Start Vibe Coding

Last weekend I started vibe coding with Lovable and it was a blast!

Picture this:
  • I'm at my computer prompting away, having fun learning how to use the Gemini API, GitHub, and Supabase
  • Woo hoo! I'm just chit chatting with the AI agent, we're building (I think?)
  • Then reality hits: 94/100 messages gone

I had a decision: should I pay to upgrade to Lovable's $50/month plan to get 250 messages? Hard pass.

I'm non-technical and cheap 💁‍♂️ I'd burn through that tier creating a mediocre MVP and face a $200 bill.

What’s a scrappy, low-budget "builder" to do?

TLDR;
  • Assemble your AI "team" using free/cheap tools
  • Use ChatGPT/Claude + a notes app to map the path
  • FAFO across free tiers - pay only when you get it
  • Embrace the deep pain of debugging  

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

My Perspective on the Chief of Staff Role


Check it out on a much prettier version on this Notion page

⚡️ A great Chief of Staff (Cos) is a high-EQ, operationally excellent, and strategic leader who helps move the entire organization forward every day. 

Read more below.

Monday, March 3, 2025

No, GenAI isn't Killing SaaS

I thought the internet moved past the "SaaS is dead" takes months ago. Apparently not

"SaaS is dead" generates engagement and points to real shifts happening in tech, but at this point it's stale and it's always been wrong.

Here’s why the arguments for “SaaS is dead” don’t hold up:

  • The argument is so broad as to be (almost) useless
  • The argument is internally inconsistent 
  • Sufficiently valuable software is very complex
  • Comparative Advantage Still Matters
  • GenAI ➡️ More Software ➡️ More SaaS, Not Less
  • SaaS Companies Are Riding the Wave
  • Performant AI Agents Are Neither Simple nor Isolated
Think "SaaS + AI" not "SaaS vs. AI."

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

How I'm Using GenAI Today @ Work

Debugging with Jam.dev -- super great tool for capturing and communicating bugs, has some AI features built in with more on the way.

Content generation -- I created a Claude Project and uploaded examples of content + our content guidelines. Now, when I need something created, I just prompt it, get the ~80% done rough draft, and edit it quickly for accuracy + tone.

Strategy thought partner -- I created a Custom GPT and gave it instructions describing the startup I work for and sometimes use it as a thought partner on how it'd approach problems.

Research - I'm playing with Gemini Advanced to do initial research using the Deep Research feature. 

Meeting AI -- I have Granola downloaded, but I find it basically useless. I like paying attention in meetings and taking notes.

Exploring
  • Guru / Dustt -- I'm exploring implementing one of this GenAI integrated tools to make work information more easily accessible
  • Delphi -- we're testing this out as a way to get a GenAI chatbot grounded in custom data before we invest in using OpenAI API's or the like.
  • Spur -- looking at this to help with QA, have not implemented yet

Most Popular Posts